SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 380

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V.K.JAIN, J.
JASJIT SINGH AND ANR. - Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF GURDWARA ELECTIONS & ORS. - Respondents
LPA No.190/2013
Decided On : 08.04.2013

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Abinash K. Mishra, Adv.
Ms. Shawana Bari for Mr. Raju Nanda, Adv.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the provisions of Rule 14 of the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (Election of Members) Rules, 1974, and its amendment with effect from 28.7.2010, regarding the recognition of religious parties and the allotment of election symbols.

Headnote:

Election - Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee - Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Act, 1971, Section 39 - Rule 14(1) - Rule 14(3) - The judgment discusses the provisions of Rule 14 of the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (Election of Members) Rules, 1974, and its amendment with effect from 28.7.2010. It highlights the requirement for recognition of a new religious party and the conditions for allotment of symbols. The court's decision is influenced by the interpretation of the unamended and amended rules, the concept of reserved symbols, and the eligibility criteria for recognition as a religious party.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant applied for registration as a recognized religious party and allotment of a reserved election symbol, which was rejected. The appellant filed a writ petition seeking quashing of the rejection and alternative prayer for the application of the amended Rule 14 from the next elections.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the appellant did not fulfill the requirement of the amended rules and had no locus standi to challenge the allotment of reserved symbols to other parties.

Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation of the unamended and amended Rule 14, the eligibility criteria for recognition as a religious party, and the challenge to the allotment of reserved symbols to other parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the unamended and amended rules, the concept of reserved symbols, and the eligibility criteria for recognition as a religious party.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed with no orders as to costs.

JUDGMENT

V.K. JAIN, J.

1. The elections to fill up the seats of Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee are held under the superintendence and control of the Directorate of Gurudwara Elections. In exercise of the powers conferred upon him by sub Section (1) and (3) of Section 39 of Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Act, 1971, the Administrator of Delhi made the Rules called Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (Election of Members) Rules, 1974. Rule 14(1) of the aforesaid Rules, prior to its amendment with effect from 28.7.2010 provided that the Director Gurudwara Election appointed under Section 13 of the aforesaid Act shall by notification in Delhi Gazette. After amendment, the rule provides that Director shall, by notification, Delhi Gazette specify the reserved symbols to be allotted to the recognized religious parties and the free symbols to be allotted to other candidates who are not set up by any recognized party at election and the condition for allotment of symbols. The requirement for recognition of a new religious party is that besides being registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, it should also have at least two elected members of Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee as its members.

2. Vide application dated 26.11.2010, the appellant no.2 Shiromani Akali Dal (UK) applied for registration as a recognized religious party and allotment of a reserved election symbol, for election of the members of Delhi Gurudwara Management Committee. The application was rejected vide order dated 2.2.2012 on the ground that though the appellant no.2 had claimed that two elected members of Delhi Sikh Gurudwaras Management Committee namely Davender Singh and Rajender Singh were its members, those persons had in writing denied being the members of the said party. Vide subsequent order dated 6.2.2012, the Director of Gurudwara Election Management Committee reserved the symbols “Bucket” for Shrimani Akali Dal (Badal) Delhi State), “Car” for Shrimani Akali Dal Delhi and “Candle” for Shiromani Akali Dal – Panthak, which are respondents no.3 to 5 respectively in this appeal. Fourteen other symbols were kept as free symbols for allotment to other candidates seeking election to the next general election of the members of Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee to be held in March, 2012. Being aggrieved from the order dated 2.2.2012 and 6.2.2012, the appellant no.2 filed W.P(C) No.1074/2012 seeking quashing of the orders dated 6.2.2012 and 2.2.2013. The alternative prayer made in the writ petition was to direct the official respondent to apply the amended Rule 14 from next elections and allot election symbol to appellant no.2 as well. When the said writ petition came up for hearing before the learned Single Judge on 30.2.2012, the prayer made by the appellants for quashing the order dated 2.2.2012 qua them was rejected and the notice limited to challenge to the order dated 6.2.2012 was issued. The learned Single Judge vide the impugned order dated 20.12.2012 dismissed the writ petition. Being aggrieved, the appellants are before us by way of this appeal.

3. Rule 14 of the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (Election of Members), Rules, 1974, as it stood prior to its amendment reads as under:

“14. Symbols-(1) The Director shall, by notification in the Delhi Gazette, specify the symbols that may be chosen by candidate at elections and the restrictions to which their choice shall be subject.

(2) Where at any such election, more nomination papers than one are delivered by or on behalf of a candidate, the declaration as to symbols, made in the nomination paper first delivered, and no other declaration as to symbols, shall be taken into consideration under rule 21 even if that nomination paper has been rejected.” After its amendment with effect from 28.7.2010, the aforesaid Rule reads as under:

“14. Symbols-(1) The Director shall, by notification in the Delhi Gazette, specify the reserved symbols to be allotted to the recognized
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top