SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 359

MANMOHAN
DRS LOGISTICS – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ms. Ekta Sarin, Advocate with Ms. Ankita Ubeja, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

MANMOHAN, J (Oral):

1. Present suit has been filed for injunction restraining infringement of registered trade marks, passing off, unfair competition and damages.

2. However, learned counsel for plaintiff fairly states that she is only pressing prayer ‘A’ and not prayers ‘B to D’.

3. The relevant facts of the present case are that in 1988, plaintiff commenced its business as a partnership firm under the name and style of M/S. AGARWAL PACKERS & MOVERS. Subsequently, in 1991, the partners of M/S. AGARWAL PACKERS & MOVERS formed the plaintiff company and merged their partnership firm with the company.

4. It is stated in the plaint that plaintiff company is today a leading packaging, moving and logistics service provider engaged inter alia in the business of providing public carriers and carriers of goods, passengers, merchandise, commodities and other products and transportation of goods and luggage of all kind and description in any part of India and elsewhere by any mode of transport.

5. It is also stated in the plaint that the mark AGARWAL PACKERS & MOVERS is registered in plaintiff’s favour in Classes 16, 17 and 39. The said certificates have been exhibited.

6. Copies of












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top