SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 315

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
RAJAT KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
R. P. KHANNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Adv.

JUDGMENT

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. The plaintiff No.1 seeks partition of property No.B-6/7, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi from his father defendant No.1 and has impleaded his father’s siblings / their heirs as defendants No.2 to 13.

2. It is the case of the plaintiff No.1 in the plaint:

(i) that his grandfather Late Sh. O.P. Khanna was the exclusive owner of the said property;

(ii) that the grandfather Sh. O.P. Khanna died intestate on 24.09.1985, leaving a widow Smt. Kamla Rani Khanna, three sons viz. the defendants No.1&2 and Sh. R.K. Khanna being the predecessor of defendants No.4, 5 & 13 and two daughters viz. defendant No.3 & Smt. Achala Mehta, predecessor of defendants No.6 to 8;

(iii) that on the demise of the grandfather Sh. O.P. Khanna, the property devolved on all the heirs aforesaid;

(iv) that the plaintiff No.1 was borne on 21.10.1977 i.e. before the demise of his grandfather on 24.09.1985 and thus the plaintiff No.1 acquired a vested right by birth in the 1/6th share of his father in the aforesaid property;

(v) that the 1/6th share inherited by the defendant No.1 being the father of the plaintiff No.1 became ancestral property in the hands of the defendant No.1, the defendant No.1

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top