SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 584

V.K.SHALI
TATA BLUE SCOPE STEEL – Appellant
Versus
SETHI GOLDEN TRANSPORT CO. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Ashutosh Dubey & Ms. Vriti Anand, Advs.

JUDGMENT

V.K. SHALI, J. (ORAL)

1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the order dated 16th May, 2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in Civil suit bearing No.282/2006 titled M/s Sethi Golden Transport Co. Vs. M/s Tata Blue Scope Steel Ltd. rejecting the application of the appellant under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction. It may be pertinent here to mention that the respondent herein had filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 11,55,516/- from the appellant. After completion of the pleadings of the parties, an issue with regard to the territorial jurisdiction was framed on the basis of the objections purported to have been taken by the appellant, which reads as under:-

“Whether this Court has no jurisdiction to try the suit? OPD”

2. The onus of proof of this issue was on the defendant/appellant, however, the appellant /defendant in order to ensure that the suit for recovery does not proceed against him, chose to file an application u/O 7 Rule 11 CPC raising the plea of territorial jurisdiction as a ground of rejection of the plaint. The said application was rejected by the impugned order. Though th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top