SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 770

S.MURALIDHAR
COIM INDIA – Appellant
Versus
KURT O JOHN SHOE COMPONENTS(I) – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Through:Mr. Pankaj Chaudhary, Advocate
Through:Mr. Murari Kumar & Mr. Yakesh Anand, Advocates

ORDER

IA No. 2523 of 2011 [under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for leave to defend]

1. This summary suit has been filed by the Plaintiff under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (‘CPC’) for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,40,64,950 together with pendente lite and future simple interest @ 22% p.a..

2. The case of the Plaintiff is that it has its registered office at Rajendra Place, New Delhi. The orders placed by Defendant No.1 were received by the Plaintiff at its office in New Delhi. Defendant No.2 is the Managing Director and signatory of the cheques issued by Defendant No.1. Even prior to 1st April 2007, the Plaintiff was supplying to Defendant No.1 several items like polyol, isocyanate Urecom, etc. on 60 days’ credit and subject to the jurisdiction of the Delhi Courts. Orders from Defendant No.1 were received and accepted by the Plaintiff at its office in New Delhi. Defendant No.1 had been remitting the on account part payment by cheques to the Plaintiff at the said registered office. The Plaintiff states that a confirmation of accounts was duly signed by the authorised signatory of Defendant No.1, Mr. Sanjay Swami, on 1st April 2007. This concerne













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top