SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 236

MANMOHAN SINGH
Analco (India) – Appellant
Versus
Navodya Exim – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Plaintiff:Umesh Mishra, Advocate.
For the Defendant:Sheel Kumar, Advocate.

Judgment :

Manmohan Singh, J. (Oral)

1. The plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, rendition of account, delivery up etc. against the defendant – M/s Navodya Exim Pvt. Ltd.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff company is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and selling of Aluminum composite Panel, Plywood, Block Boards, Wood Doors, Window Frames, Veneers, Flush Doors, Lumber Metallic Laminates, Sun Mica and Nuts, Bolts, Screws, Washers, Leaf Springs, Clips, U.J. Cross, Steel Balls, Control Cables, Locks, Spokes and Rings, Aldrops, Latches, Channel, Door Stops, Hinges, Window and Door Fittings bearing trade mark ALOMAX, which falls in the Class-6 & 19 of the classification of goods under Schedule IV of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The said trade mark is being used by the plaintiff since 2000.

3. The plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trade mark ALOMAX for Plywood, Block Boards, Wood Doors, Windows Frames, Veneers, Flush Doors, Lumber Mettalic Laminates, Sun Mica in Class-19 vide No.1321329. The plaintiff’s application for registration in Class-6 was pending at the time of filing of t




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top