SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 101

High Court of Delhi
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
Oriental Cuisines Private Ltd.
Versus
Star Restaurants Private Ltd.
CS (OS). No. 1069 of 2008 & I.A. No. 8638 of 2008
Decided On : 10-01-2014

Advocate Appeared:
For the Plaintiff:H.P. Singh, Navroop Singh, Advocates.

The likelihood of confusion, misrepresentation, and damage to goodwill constitutes passing off, justifying the grant of permanent injunction.

Headnote:

Trademark Infringement - Passing Off - Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Civil Procedure Code (CPC) - Cadila Health Care Ltd. Vs. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Fact of the Case:

The Plaintiff, Oriental Cuisines Private Limited, alleged passing off and infringement of its trademark and copyright in the mark “THE NOODLE HOUSE” by the defendant, Star Restaurants Private Limited, and sought permanent injunction, mandatory injunction, damages, and costs.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the defendant's use of the mark “THE NOODLE HOUSE” for identical services was likely to cause confusion, mislead the public, and dilute the plaintiff’s mark, satisfying the elements for passing off as laid down in Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting permanent injunction and costs, but declined to award damages.

Issues: Alleged passing off and infringement of trademark, entitlement to injunction, damages, and costs.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles of passing off as laid down in Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. to determine the likelihood of confusion, misrepresentation, and damage to the plaintiff's goodwill, leading to the grant of permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff.

Final Decision: The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting permanent injunction and costs, but declining to award damages.

Judgment :

Vipin Sanghi, J.

1. The Plaintiff, Oriental Cuisines Private Limited, has filed the present suit alleging passing off and infringement of its trademark and copyright in the mark “THE NOODLE HOUSE” by the defendant, Star Restaurants Private Limited, and consequently seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, whether acting by itself or through its partners or proprietor, its officers, servants, agents and representatives from manufacturing and selling and offering for sale or supply, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing or rendering services in the hospitality industry or other related goods and services under the mark/ name “THE NOODLE HOUSE” and/or any other mark confusingly similar thereto, or any imitation or variation thereof, amounting to an infringement and passing-off of the plaintiff company’s trademark; using the mark “THE NOODLE HOUSE” and/or any deceptively similar name, from in any manner holding out an association of its products or business with that of the plaintiff and from doing acts as to pass off or likely to pass off the defendant’s goods or business as those of the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff also prays for a decree of mandatory injunction ordering the defendant, its partners or proprietor, their officers, servants, agents, representatives, distributors and assigns to hand over all products, packaging cartons, unfinished products, bill boards etc bearing the mark “THE NOODLE HOUSE” to the plaintiff. In addition, the plaintiff also prays for damages and costs of the suit.

3. The plaintiff is a private limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 on 10.05.1994, having its registered office at Chennai. The plaintiff company is in the business of global specialty and hospitality management engaged in discovering, developing and commercializing food courts and popular food chains and restaurants serving a variety of cuisines. The present suit relates to the plaintiff’s rights in the trademark “THE NOODLE HOUSE” which was adopted and introduced by the plaintiff company in December 2003 in respect of restaurants serving Indo-Chinese cuisine.

4. The defendant is a private limited concern in the business of hospitality and restaurant management. The plaintiffs allege that in May 2008, the plaintiff learnt of the proposed launch of the defendant’s restaurant “THE NOODLE HOUSE” at MGF Mall, Saket, Delhi proposing to offer the same cuisine as the plaintiff’s restaurant. In the aforesaid background, the plaintiff filed the present suit seeking the reliefs mentioned hereinabove.

5. Summons were issued in the suit vide order dated 30.05.2008 returnable on 11.07.2008. As service report was awaited, fresh summons were issued vide order dated 11.07.2008 returnable on 12.08.2008 on which date summons were again directed to be issued returnable on 12.09.2008. On 12.09.2008, service report was awaited and the matter was renotified for 19.11.2008. On 19.12.2008, the defendant was proceeded ex parte as despite being served with ‘Dasti’ summons on 22.10.2008, the defendant failed to put in an appearance and file its written statement. Order dated 19.12.2008 also allowed the plaintiff’s application under Order 39, Rule 1&2, Civil Procedure Code (CPC) and restrained the defendant from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising or rendering services in hospitality industry or other related goods and services under the trademark “THE NOODLE HOUSE” or any mark deceptively similar thereto amounting to infringement and passing off till the disposal of the suit. On 09.11.2009, notice was issued on the plaintiff’s application under Order 10, Rule 1 CPC for impleadment of Jumeirah Group LLC as defendant no.2. This application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 16.07.2012 in view of a settlement arrived at in another suit being CS (OS) 1947/2008 between Jumeirah Group LLC and the plaintiff on 13.07.2012. A copy of the settlement agreement has been placed on recor

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top