SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 463

INDERMEET KAUR
Krishan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants:Siddhartha Aggarwal, Adit S. Pujari, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Fizani Hussain, APP.

Judgment :

Indermeet Kaur, J.

1. The appellants before this Court are Gopi and Krishan. They had been convicted under Section 376(2) for the offence of gang rape and Section 506 Part-I read with Section 34 IPC vide judgment dated 01.5.2001. Vide order of sentence dated 04.5.2001 Gopi had been sentenced RI for 11 years for the offence under Section 376(2)(g) IPC and a fine of Rs.2000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for six months; for the offence under section 506 Part-I he had been sentenced to undergo RI for two years. Accused Krishan had been sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs.2000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for six months for the offence under Section 376 (2)(g) IPC and for the offence under Section 506 Part-I he had been sentenced to undergo RI for two years. Benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. had been granted to them.

2. Version of the prosecution unfolded in the version of Smt. “D” examined as PW-3. Incident is dated 02.9.1993; time of incident was about 10:00 – 10:30 p.m. The first information about this incident was received by SI Hari Chand (PW-10) posted at the police control room on 03.9.1993 at 100 number. This informati























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top