SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 1633

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
RAKESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
KALAWATI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Sumit Bansal & Mr. Ateev Mathur, Advs.
None.

JUDGMENT

1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 17.03.2004 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi in suit No.642/2001, declining the relief of specific performance of an agreement dated 29.05.1986 of sale of immovable property as well as alternative relief claimed of recovery of damages of Rs.3,00,000/- but directing the respondents / defendants No.1 to 4 to refund to the appellant / plaintiff Rs.30,000/- paid as advance under the said Agreement to Sell together with interest thereon at 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till realization.

2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the Trial Court record requisitioned. Vide subsequent order dated 19.01.2005, the appeal was admitted for hearing. Vide order dated 04.03.2005, the respondents were directed to maintain status quo with regard to the nature, title and possession of the subject land subject to the appellant / plaintiff depositing the total consideration payable in terms of Agreement to Sell dated 29.05.1986 in this Court. In compliance therewith a sum of Rs.2,73,875/- was deposited. Vide order dated 26.07.2006, the interim order already granted was ordered to continue pending furth










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top