SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 767

G.S.SISTANI
Mukesh Jain – Appellant
Versus
Akash Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff:Vishwender Verma, Advocate.
For the Defendant:Rishi Pal Singh, Advocate.

Judgment

G.S. Sistani, J (Oral)

I.A. 5196/2012

1. This is an application under Order 37 Rule 2 & 3 CPC filed by the defendant for entering appearance.

2. Since the defendant has entered appearance through counsel, the present application stands disposed of.

IA.No.4062/2013

3. Previous costs imposed have not been paid. The same stands waived of as prayed.

4. Plaintiff has filed the present suit under the provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Memo of appearance was filed and thereafter the plaintiff has filed an application for summons for judgment. Defendant has filed the present application for leave to defend.

5. According to the plaint, the plaintiff was desirous of selling gold weighing 2010 grams and he wanted to raise money from the same. The defendant approached the plaintiff. Accordingly on 17.2.2010 the entire gold worth Rs.20,10,000/- was purchased by the defendant from the plaintiff and a sum of Rs.45,000/- was paid in cash to the plaintiff and it was agreed that the balance amount of Rs.19,65,000/- would be paid within a period of three months along with interest to the tune of Rs.35,000/-, thereon, amounting to a total of Rs.20.00 lakhs. A























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top