SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 1017

High Court of Delhi
S.P. GARG, J.
Suraj
Versus
NCT of Delhi
CRL.A. No. 1357 of 2011
Decided On : 01-04-2014

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Shekh Israr Ahmad, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Lovkesh Sawhney, APP.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on consistent testimonies, medical evidence, and the appellant's inconsistent defense to support the conviction under Section 326 IPC.

Headnote:

Acid Attack - Criminal Law - Section 326 IPC - [Section 326 IPC] - The court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 326 IPC for voluntarily causing dangerous injuries by throwing acid on the victims. The court considered the medical evidence, witness testimonies, and the appellant's inconsistent defense to support the conviction. The court also modified the sentence based on the appellant's jail conduct and the extent of injuries sustained by the victims.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted under Section 326 IPC for causing acid attack injuries to multiple victims. The victims sustained burn injuries due to the acid attack, and the appellant pleaded false implication, claiming provocation for his actions.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the appellant guilty based on the consistent testimonies of the victims and medical evidence. The court also considered the appellant's inconsistent defense and modified the sentence based on the appellant's jail conduct and the extent of injuries sustained by the victims.

Issues: The issues involved the appellant's intent in causing the acid attack, the credibility of the appellant's defense of provocation, and the extent of injuries sustained by the victims.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the consistent testimonies of the victims, medical evidence, and the appellant's inconsistent defense to uphold the conviction under Section 326 IPC. The court also considered the appellant's jail conduct and the extent of injuries sustained by the victims in modifying the sentence.

Final Decision: The appellant's conviction under Section 326 IPC was upheld, and the sentence was modified to RI for three years with a fine of Rs.1,000/- and failing to pay the fine to further undergo SI for fifteen days.

Judgment

S.P. Garg, J.

1. Suraj (the appellant) impugns a judgment dated 17.02.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in case FIR No.277/09 registered at Police Station H.N. Din by which he was convicted under Section 326 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 19.02.2011, he was awarded RI for five years with fine Rs.10,000/-.

2. Prosecution case, as revealed in the charge-sheet, was that on 04.07.2009 at about 06.30 p.m. in front of House No.210, Near Qureshi Masjid, Basti Hazrat Nizamuddin, the appellant-Suraj voluntarily caused dangerous injuries to Sobha Rani, Prem Wati, Ritu and Thakur Singh by throwing acid on them with an intention to commit murder. The victims were medically examined. The Investigating Officer lodged First Information Report after recording complainant-Ritu’s statement (Ex.PW- 1/A). Statements of witnesses conversant with the facts were recorded. After completion of investigation, a charge-sheet was filed under Section 307 IPC against the accused; he was duly charged; and brought to trial. The prosecution examined ten witnesses to establish appellant’s involvement in the crime. In 313 statement, the appellant pleaded false implication and came up with the plea that acid was thrown by him after he was inflicted injuries on head by a lathi by his sister-in-law-Sobha Rani. He did not examine any defence witness. The trial resulted in his conviction under Section 326 IPC. It is significant to note that the State did not challenge his acquittal under Section 307 IPC.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and examined the file. Appellant’s counsel urged that the injuries inflicted to the victims were the result of grave provocation when Suraj was hit/inflicted injuries by a lathi on his head. No cross-case was registered against the assailants. The victims are his close relations and intended to grab his property. They have succeeded in grabbing one jhuggi after his detention in jail. Prayer was made to modify the sentence order as the appellant was not involved in any criminal case and has suffered custody for about more than a year. He is unmarried and none else is there to look after his property/jhuggi. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor urged that the prosecution witnesses have categorically deposed that acid was thrown at them intentionally and voluntarily by the appellant without any provocation.

4. The occurrence took place at around 06.30 p.m. The victims Sobha Rani, Prem Wati, Ritu and Thakur Singh had sustained burn injuries due to throwing of acid and were medically examined vide MLC’s (Ex.PW-8/A, Ex.PW-8/B, Ex.PW-8/C and Ex.PW-8/D respectively) at Safdarjung hospital. The MLCs record their arrival time at 09.30 p.m. PW-8 (Dr. Monisha) medically examined the victims and opined the nature of injuries sustained by them as ‘dangerous caused by acid’. Daily Dairy (DD) No.56B about the occurrence was recorded at 06.48 p.m. The investigation was marked to ASI Narender who with HC B.D. Niwas went to the spot. Rukka (Ex.PW-10/A) was sent for registering the FIR at 11.30 p.m. after recording statement (Ex.PW-1/A). Apparently, there was no inordinate delay in lodging the FIR. In the complaint, Ritu (PW-1) described the incident in detail and disclosed as to how and under what circumstances Suraj threw acid on her and her mother-Sobha Rani. When her aunt Prem Wati and brother Thakur intervened, Suraj also threw acid on them. While appearing as PW-1, Ritu proved the version given to the police without major variations. She deposed that on 04.07.2009 at about 06.30 p.m. when she and her mother were present in the house, the accused-Suraj came and started abusing them. When her mother objected to that, the accused threatened to deface her. Thereafter, accused-Suraj went inside his house, brought a bottle filled with acid and threw it on her mother’s breast. He also threw acid on her which caused burn injuries on her right side face, both the shoulders and also the front upper portion of chest. Wh



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top