N.V.RAMANA, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Santosh Arora – Appellant
Versus
M. L. Arora – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 27th September, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of this Court (exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction) of dismissal of application being IA No.742/2013 filed by the appellants under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of the plaint in CS(OS) No.1982/2012 filed by the respondent.
2. Notice of the appeal was issued and vide ad interim order dated 17th December, 2013, the operation of the said order dated 27th September, 2013 was stayed and further proceedings in the suit also stayed.
3. We have heard the counsel for the appellants/defendants and the counsel for the respondent/plaintiff.
4. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit wherefrom this appeal has arisen for recovery of Rs.1,37,97,000/-from the appellants/defendants jointly and severally, towards arrears of rent, damages for use and occupation of the premises/mesne profits, pleading:-
(i) that the respondent/plaintiff is the owner of shop and flat no.128, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi;
(ii) that the appellants/defendants are the legal heirs of the brother of the respondent/plaintiff;
(iii) that the shop aforesaid was earlier in
M/s. Marshall Sons & Co. (I) Ltd. vs. M/s. Sahi Oretans (P) Ltd. (1999) 2 SCC 325
Magunta Kota Reddy Vs. Pothula Chendrasekhara Reddy AIR 1963 AP 42
Gopalakrishna Pillai Vs. Meenakshi Ayal AIR 1967 SC 155
R.S. Madanappa Vs. Chandramma AIR 1965 SC 1812 & Bhagwati Prasad Vs. Shri Chandramaul AIR 1966 SC
Sadhu Singh Vs. Pritam Singh AIR 1976 P&H 38
Shiv Kumar Sharma Vs. Santosh Kumari (2007) 8 SCC 600
S. Santokh Singh Vs Gurbux Singh & Syndicate Bank Vs. Raj Kumar Tanwar 154 (2008) DLT 230(DB)).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.