SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 1215

High Court of Delhi
S.P. GARG, J.
Inder Dev Yadav & Others
Versus
State of Delhi
CRL.A. No. 545 of 2011 & CRL.M.B. No. 209 of 2014
Decided On: 01-05-2014

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:Rajni Singh, U.K. Giri, Ajay Verma, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Lovkesh Sawhney, APP.

The importance of independent public witnesses, thorough verification of antecedents, and ruling out any possibility of tampering with evidence are crucial in establishing the authenticity and credibility of the prosecution's case.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Conviction based on testimonies of police personnel alone - Lack of independent public witness - Discrepancies in evidence - Lack of verification of antecedents - Conviction and sentence set aside

Fact of the Case:

The appellants were convicted under Section 20 of the NDPS Act based on the prosecution's case that they were apprehended with a large quantity of ganja in a truck. The prosecution's case relied solely on the testimonies of police personnel, with no independent public witness involved.

Finding of the Court:

The court found serious discrepancies and deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including lack of independent witnesses, inconsistencies in evidence, and failure to verify the antecedents of the appellants. As a result, the court set aside the conviction and sentence of the appellants.

Issues: Lack of independent public witness, discrepancies in evidence, failure to verify antecedents

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of independent public witnesses to lend authenticity and credibility to the search and recovery process. It also highlighted the duty of the prosecution to rule out any possibility of tampering with evidence and the need for thorough verification of the accused's antecedents.

Final Decision: The conviction and sentence awarded to the appellants were set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The court ordered the trial court record to be sent back and the appellants to be released forthwith if not required in any other case.

Judgment

S.P. Garg, J.

1. Inder Dev Yadav (A-1), Sushil Parsad (A-2) and Ram Dev Mandal (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 30.03.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 147/08 arising out of FIR No. 438/08 PS Jahangir Puri by which they were convicted under Section 20 Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (in short NDPS Act). By an order dated 06.04.2011, they were awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 1,00,000/- each.

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the chargesheet was that on 26.08.2008 secret information was received by SI Bhasker Sharma at his office (Crime Branch) at 11.00 A.M. that A-1 who was main supplier of ganja would come along with his associates in a mini truck No. UP 78 T 2234 at Outer Ring Road, Bhalsava Red Light. The information reduced into writing vide Daily Diary (DD) No.6 (Ex.PW-1/A) shared with senior police officers. On their directions, a raiding party was organised and the police team left along with the secret informer in a private vehicle Qualis vide Daily Diary (DD) No.7 (Ex.PW- 1/B) at 11.30 A.M. and reached at the spot at 12.00 (noon). Request was made to four / five passersby to join the raiding team but none agreed. At around 12.30 P.M. a mini truck No. UP 78 T 2234 came from ISBT side and was parked about hundred meters away from the red light. The secret informer recognised A-1 sitting in the truck. The police team waited for someone to take delivery of the contraband. When none appeared to take delivery, at around 01.00 P.M. the truck was raided and the appellants were apprehended. Notices under Section 50 NDPS Act were served to them. On enquiry, the appellants disclosed that they had concealed ‘ganja’ in a cabin in the truck. After opening the nuts of the cabin, fourty parcels were recovered. The total weight of the contraband came to 312.600 kg. Samples were taken and sealed. The Investigating Officer prepared rukka (Ex.PW-1/A) and sent through HC Lakvinder for lodging First Information Report. At 05.30 P.M., SI Sanjay reached the spot and took over the investigation. He recorded the statements of the witnesses conversant with the facts. The accused persons were arrested. Further case of the prosecution was that on 28.08.2008, on the basis of secret information, Jai Kishan Sahani @ Buti Lal (since PO) was arrested and certain documents were recovered from his possession which were seized vide seizure memo (Ex.PW-5/A). During investigation, the sample pullandas were sent to Forensic Science Laboratory for examination and its report was collected. After completion of investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted against the appellants; they were duly charged and brought to trial. The prosecution examined ten witnesses to substantiate the charges. In 313 statements, the appellants pleaded false implication and denied their involvement in the crime. They examined DW-1 (Sanjiv Singh) and DW-2 (Rita Devi) in defence. On evaluation of the evidence and after considering the rival contentions of the parties, the Trial Court, by the impugned judgment, convicted the appellants as mentioned previously. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied, they have preferred the appeal.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record. The secret information was reduced into writing by recording Daily Diary (DD) No.6 (Ex.PW-1/A) at 11.00 A.M. by SI Bhasker Sharma. It does not record presence of HC Lakvinder and Const.Sanjay in the office with him at that time. It does not reveal the time when the supplier of contraband with his associates would arrive. Admittedly, copy of this DD entry (Ex.PW-1/A) was not delivered / shown to the senior officers. It does not disclose as to in what manner / mode, the secret information was shared with the senior officers Insp. Anand and concerned ACP as none of them was examined. Daily Diary (DD) No.7 (Ex.PW-1/B) recorded at 11.30 A.M. reveals departure of raiding team in a private vehicle. However, it is conspicuously









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top