VED PRAKASH VAISH
Pankjani Swain – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
Ved Prakash Vaish, J.
1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the petitioner challenges the order dated 23.3.2013 passed by Metropolitan Magistrate-10, South West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi whereby the application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner was dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner filed a complaint under Section 156(3) read with Section 190 of Cr.P.C. for the offence under Sections 380/392/394/445/446/448/451/453/454/457/34 IPC. The petitioner/complainant is the owner of RZF-172-B, Gali No.32, Sadh Nagar-II, Near Pradhan Chowk, Palam Colony, New Delhi. The son of the petitioner, Sunil Swain was in love with proposed accused No.1/ Mayuri Ruhella. Both of them insisted their parents for solemnizing their marriage and finally on 11.3.2012, the marriage between Sunil Swain and Mayuri Ruhella/ respondent no. 2 was solemnized. After their marriage, both of them stayed in the matrimonial house for 2-3 days and then went to Vaishno Devi. After about one week, accused No.1 starting misbehaving with the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.