SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 1449

VED PRAKASH VAISH
Shahnawaj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:A.C. David, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Naveen Sharma, APP.

Judgment

Ved Prakash Vaish, J.

1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Code Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to ‘Cr.P.C.’), the petitioner has challenged order dated 30.05.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Central), Delhi whereby criminal revision filed by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. In nutshell, the brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/ Dr.Shahnawaj lodged FIR No.670/2007 under Sections 325/34 IPC registered at PS Darya Ganj, New Delhi. On completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed against accused, Mohd. Yusuf and Rizwan Yusuf. Vide order dated 06.02.2010, summons were issued against the accused. Thereafter, non-bailable warrants were issued against Respondent No. 2/Mohd.Yusuf. Vide order dated 09.12.2010, learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi issued process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. against Respondent No. 2 and directed for publication in one leading newspaper having circulation in the concerned area. Vide order dated 18.02.2011, trial Court observed that copy of newspaper has not been filed. The case was adjourned for filing the copy of newspaper in which publication was made and notice was issued for the statement of proc





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top