S.RAVINDRA BHAT, VIBHU BAKHRU
Madhukar Khosla – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
C.M.No.2745 of 2014 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 1320/2014, C.M. No.2744/2014
1. The petitioner challenges the notice dated 25.03.2013 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act (“the Act”) proposing to re-open the assessment for Assessment Year 2006-07 @ Rs.1,12,760/- completed under Section 143 (3) by the Assessing Officer (“AO”).
2. The brief facts are that the petitioner filed income tax returns on 30.10.2006 for AY 2006-07. The returns were selected for scrutiny; a notice was issued on 28.02.2008 along with a questionnaire. The required details were furnished by the petitioner on 07-03-2008. The AO, accepting the explanations, framed the assessment on 28-03-2008. In this background of circumstances, the respondent AO sought to re-open the assessment by the impugned notice, under Section 147 of the Act. Responding to this notice, the assessee, on 22-04-2013 stated that it stood by the returns filed originally (and accepted by the AO on 28-03-2008); it also requested that the reasons for re-opening the assessment be furnished.
3. The Revenue acceded to the petitioner’s request; the reasons furnished are extracted b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.