S.RAVINDRA BHAT, SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
NTPC Limited – Appellant
Versus
V. U. Seemon – Respondent
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
1. In these proceedings, the appellant, National Thermal Power Ltd (hereafter NTPC), is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 07.08.2009 of a learned Single Judge of this Court in CS (OS) 1393-A/1999, CS (OS) 1444-A/1999 and I.A. 9932/1999. The impugned judgment rejected NTPC's challenge to an award, preferred under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
2. The brief facts are that on 25.05.1987, NTPC accepted the bid of M/s V.U. Seemon (the Respondent, hereafter “the Contractor” or the “claimant”) dated 20.12.1986, made through their Telex Award dated 07.05.1987 and awarded the contract for the construction of boundary wall and fencing package for Kawas Gas Power Project. The scheduled completion of the entire work was 06.05.1988. An extension of six and a half months however was granted to the Contractor. Later, alleging non-completion as on 21.04.1989, a notice was given by NTPC requiring completion of the balance work by 15.05.1989, failing which it threatened to award the balance work to another agency at the risk and cost of the Contractor. On 19.06.1989, NTPC terminated the contract, in term
Gujarat Water Supply and Sewage Board v. Unique Erectors (Gujarat) (P) Ltd. & Anr. [AIR 1989 SC 973]
Food Corporation of India v. Joginderpal Mohinderpal & Anr. [(1989) 2 SCC 347].
Arosan Enterprises v. Union of India
J.G. Engineers Private Limited vs. Union of India and Anr., (2011) 5 SCC 758
BSNL vs. Motorola India (P) Ltd.
Food Corporation of India Vs Joginderpal Mohinderpal & Another AIR 1989 SC 1263
Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India AIR 1989 SC 777
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.