SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 1750

NAJMI WAZIRI
Rishal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bohat Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Sunil, Advocate.
For the Respondents:J.K. Jain, Advocate.

Judgment

Najmi Waziri, J.

This petition impugns an eviction order dated 31.3.2012, which rejected the petitioner/tenant’s application seeking leave to defend the respondents/landlords’ eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short ‘the Act’). The eviction order has been passed against the petitioner apropos the tenanted premises WZ-1/A/19, Ground Floor, Village Tatarpur, New Delhi-110027, admeasuring 11ft X 9ft. The admitted rent was Rs.1,200/- per month. The landlord sought the eviction on the ground that his grandson required the property to start his own business and that the landlord had no property, other than the suit property from where he could run his business. The tenant, however, contended that there was no need, much less, a bona fide need since the landlord had other shops lying vacant and could put them to use. He further submits that the petition has been filed only to harass the tenant to pay a higher monthly rent. The learned counsel for the tenant states that the landlord was in possession of two other shops but had concealed these facts in the eviction petition. It is also argued that the site pl


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top