G.ROHINI, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Sumitra Parashar – Appellant
Versus
Raj Rani – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 24th January, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court (exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction in CS(OS) No.2154/2010 filed by the respondents) of allowing IA No.8419/2013 of the respondnts/plaintiffs for amendment of the plaint. Notice of the appeal was issued and vide ad interim order dated 4th April, 2014 which continues to be in force, the operation of the impugned order was stayed. We have heard the counsel for the appellants/defendants and the senior counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs.
2. The two respondents/plaintiffs instituted the suit from which this appeal arises, (i) for recovery of possession of property No.53, Sector-12, Block-B, Dwarka, New Delhi ad measuring 334 sq. mtrs. together with mesne profits/damages for use and occupation from the date of institution of the suit till the date when the possession is handed over; (ii) for permanent injunction restraining the two defendants/appellants from raising any further construction on the suit property and/or selling, alienating, encumbering, disposing of or otherwise dealing with the said property; (iii) for permanent inju
Vidyabai Vs. Padmalatha Vs. Padmalatha (2009) 2 SCC 409
Chander Kanta Bansal Vs. Rajinder Singh Anand AIR 2008 SC 2234
Mashyak Grihnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Vs. Usman Habib Dhuka (2013) 9 SCC 485
Rajkumar Gurawara Vs. K. Sarwagi and Company Private Limited (2008) 14 SCC 364
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.