G.ROHINI, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Abhishek Kumar @ Bal Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
C.M.No.6745/2014(exemptions).
1. Allowed subject to just exceptions.
2. The CM stands disposed of.
3. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, i) impugns Rule 69.1 of the Examination Bye-Laws of the respondents no.2&3 Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), on the ground of the same being illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the Fundamental Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under the Constitution of India; ii) seeks quashing of the order dated 12th February, 2014 of the respondent CBSE rejecting the request of the petitioner for change of his name in the records of the respondent CBSE; and, iii) seeks a mandamus to the respondent CBSE to change the name of the petitioner in its records as well as in the certificates of Class X and Class XII issued to the petitioner.
4. It is the case of the petitioner:-
(a) that the petitioner, born on 18th January, 1970, was named Bal Kishan by his parents;
(b) that the petitioner passed the Class X and Class XII examinations conducted by the respondent CBSE in the years 1988 and 1990 respectively;
(c) that the petitioner, throughout his school and college education, was teased by t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.