SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 1643

S.P.GARG
Paramjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Avadh Kaushik, Advocate.
For the Respondent: M.N. Dudeja, APP.

Judgment :

S.P. Garg, J.

1. The appellant – Paramjit Singh challenges the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 02.09.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 21/08 arising out of FIR No. 530/05 PS Prashant Vihar by which he was convicted under Sections 307/34 IPC. By an order dated 07.09.2011, he was awarded RI for three years with fine Rs.5,000/-.

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as unfolded in the chargesheet during trial was that on 14.06.2005 at about 11.00 P.M. in DDA Shopping Complex, Near Petrol Pump, Sector 16, the appellant and his associate Padam Thapa (Proclaimed Offender) sharing common intention inflicted injuries to Murari Lal in an attempt to murder him. The victim was taken to Dr.Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital (in short ‘BSA Hospital’) and was medically examined. The accused persons were arrested. Statements of the witnesses conversant with the facts were recorded to substantiate the charges. After completion of investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted against the appellant and Padam Thapa; they were duly charged and brought to trial. In 313 statement, the appellant pleaded false implication and denied his presence at the spot. The t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top