MUKTA GUPTA
Standard Chartered Bank (China) Limited Shenzhen Branch – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of Patiala – Respondent
Mukta Gupta, J.
1. By these applications Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 seek leave to defend the suit filed by the Plaintiff under Order XXXVIICPC for recovery of USD 180921.35 equivalent to Rs. 83,26,000/- along with pendent lite and future interest till actual realization. The Plaintiff is a company incorporated under the laws of China and is having one of its office at Shenzhen, China. Defendant No. 1 is State Bank of Patiala having its Head Office at Patiala with various branches including the branch at Darya Ganj, New Delhi. Defendant No. 2 is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 37, Netaji Subhash Marg, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-110002 and is carrying on the business of manufacturing and sale of copper tube made from copper cathode which is the raw material. Defendant No. 3 Company in Hongkong entered into an agreement with Defendant No. 2 Company for supply of copper cathodes. At the instance of Defendant No. 2, Defendant No. 1 issued irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit (in short 'SBLC') in favour of Plaintiff bank, the beneficiary in order to extend General Banking Facility to Defendant No. 3 at Shenzhen, China. Thereafter, the SBLC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.