Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

Crl.M.B.No.2458/2013 in Crl. Appeal No.629/2013

1. Dismissed as infructuous since the appeals are being heard today and thus the question of suspending the sentence pending hearing of the appeal does not arise.

Crl.A.629/2013, CRL.A.888/2013, CRL.A.1132/2013 & CRL.A.418/2014

1. Co-convict Naeem has not filed any appeal challenging the impugned decision.

2. The irrefutable evidence capturing the movements of Sarfaraj, Shahjad, Mohd.Arif and Mohd.Azad Alam, the four appellants and the fifth co-convict Naeem when they committed an armed dacoity in the shop of Amar Nath Gupta PW-11 is captured in the CCTV footage Ex.PX1 and Ex.PX2 seized by SI Umesh Rana the Investigating Officer. We have seen the two footages captured by the CCTV cameras and stored in the memory of the hard disk of the computer of the CCTV. The two footages have been seized by SI Umesh Rana on being handed over by Amar Nath Gupta. The first seizure is on February 05, 2011 and the seizure memo relatable thereto is Ex.PW-15/B. It relates to the CCTV footage stored in the memory for the period around 9.56 P.M. till 9.58 P.M. on February 04, 2011. The second footage seized vide memo Ex.PW-15/E is