INDERMEET KAUR
Haryana Petrochemicals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Indian Petro chemicals ltd. – Respondent
Indermeet Kaur, J.
1 By this common judgment four revision petitions shall be decided. Parties are common; Haryana Petrochemical Ltd. and its Managing Director Rajiv Aggarwal are revisionists before this Court; the respondent/complainant is Indian Petrochemicals Ltd.
A. Criminal Revision Petition No.546/2011 has impugned the judgment and order of sentence dated 17.9.2011 and 27.9.2011 respectively passed by the Sessions Judge wherein he had endorsed the finding of the Magistrate qua the convictions of the petitioners under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act). The sentence of fine of Rs.5000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for 7 days awarded by the Magistrate stood modified by the Sessions Judge. The Sessions Judge had awarded compensation of Rs.50 lacs to the complainant company which amount had to be paid within one month failing which the complainant was at liberty to get the sentence executed. This Court notes that the cheque amount in this case was Rs.1,19,80,800/-.
B. Criminal Revision Petition No.656/2009 has impugned the judgment and order of sentence dated 17.11.2009 and 25.11.2009 respectively passed by the Sessions Judge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.