PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, MUKTA GUPTA
Raju – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi – Respondent
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
1. Raju was charged for committing the murder of Smt. Shashi Rai and firing upon Ajay thus causing bullet injuries on his person in furtherance of common intention with one ‘A’ a juvenile. Vide impugned judgment dated July 16, 2014 the learned Trial Court has convicted Raju for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, 307/34 IPC and 25 Arms Act and has sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine in sum of Rs. 50,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and fine in sum of Rs. 50,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC and to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 1 year for the offence punishable under Section 25 Arms Act vide the order on sentence dated July 22, 2014.
2. Learned counsel for Raju assailing the impugned judgment contends that the version of Ajay Rai PW-2 casts a doubt on the presence of Preeti PW-1. Further version of Ajay Rai is not corroborated by any other evidence. The recovery of fire arm is not connected to the offence committed. Even as per the version of the prosecution when the juvenile tried to run away the deceased tried
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.