Vipin Sanghi, J.

1. The aforesaid leave petitions have been preferred to assail the similar judgments rendered by Sh. Gajender Singh Nagar, MM-01 (Central), Karkardooma Courts (East), Delhi in four complaint cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act). The details of the complaint cases are as follows:

Crl LP No. Complaint No. Cheque No. , Dated & Bank Amount

540/2014 5789/2010 415490 dt.12.08.2007 drawn on Syndicate Bank 3,50,000

541/2014 6617/2010 449125 dt. 04.04.2008 drawn on ICICI Bank 2,85,000

542/2014 5411/2010 462444 dt. 14.08.2007 drawn on ICICI Bank 1,25,000

576/2014 7128/2010 418124 dt. 15.10.2007 drawn on Syndicate Bank 50,000

2. By the impugned similar judgments, the learned MM has dismissed the said complaints preferred against the same respondent/accused Rohit Dua.

3. The case of the complainant was that the respondent/accused was a tenant at the relevant time of the complainant at Shop No.4RH, Shanker Market, Railway Road, Shahdara, Delhi for 7-8 months. The complainants claimed that the accused had taken loans aggregating to Rs.7,60,000/- in all, and in respect thereof, from time to time, the aforesaid cheques had been issued for repay