SANJIV KHANNA, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Advocate Manish Kumar Khanna – Appellant
Versus
Delhi High Court – Respondent
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeks the reliefs of, (i) a direction to this Court to “follow the mandatory direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Anil Rai regarding passing of the judgments/orders within two months of the hearing” etc. (ii) a direction to this Court to “follow the model case law system as stated in the Salem Advocate Bar Association case”; (iii) a direction to this Court to “speed up the hearings of the PIL, people in jail and bail matters”; (iv) a direction to this Court as well as the Trial Courts to “follow the good old practice of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in recording the actual time (not just duration) for which a matter has been heard on a particular occasion in every daily order and put every order on internet”; and, (v) a direction to “the State and the Government to provide for adequate structure in the form of Prosecutors, Standing Counsels, sufficient manpower in the Legal Department”.
2. The petition was listed for admission on 22nd January, 2014, 29th January, 2014, 17th February, 2014 when no order, neither admitting the petiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.