SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 413

VIPIN SANGHI
Hari Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Ranjeet – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Jai Prakash, Advocate.

Judgment :-

Vipin Sanghi, J.

1. The present leave petition has been preferred under Section 378(4) Cr PC to seek leave to appeal against the judgment dated 13.01.2015 passed by Sh. Jagmohan Singh, MM (NI Act)-03 Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in CC No.6485/2014, whereby the respondent/accused has been acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act).

2. The case of the petitioner/complainant in his complainant was that he had advanced a friendly loan of Rs.23,70,000/- to the accused in the month of June-July 2008. The accused had undertaken to repay the same before January 2009. In discharge of his liability towards the complainant, the accused issued two post dated cheques, one dated 21.08.2008 for Rs.11,60,000/- and the other dated 10.01.2009 for Rs.12 lacs drawn on his bank.

3. The accused then requested the complainant not to present the cheque on the due dates. When the first cheque was presented for payment, it was received unpaid on account of “insufficient funds” vide memo dated 03.01.2009. Thereafter, the second cheque was presented for encashment, which too was returned on 10.01.2009 with the remark “payment stopped by drawer”. Conseque























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top