VED PRAKASH VAISH
Mohd. Arif – Appellant
Versus
Cardio Products Corporation – Respondent
1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside the order dated 31.08.2012 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court – V, Karkardooma Court, Delhi in I.D. No. 1/2012.
2. Brief facts as borne out from the petition are that the petitioner was employed by respondent No.1 as a Sales and Service Engineer on probation for a period of six months. Respondent No.1 withheld the salary of the petitioner in August 2011 under the pretext of financial crunch. On 11.10.2011, the petitioner demanded his salary however, one Mr. Surender Singh, Chief Executive of respondent No.1 asked him to leave the premises of the respondent and his services were terminated on the same day. Thereafter, the petitioner served a legal demand notice on respondent No.1 against his illegal termination and non-payment of his earned salary for the months from August 2011 to October 2011. Respondent No.1 did not reply to the same in consequence to which petitioner filed a statement of claim under Section 10(4A) of the Industrial Disputes (Delhi Amendment) Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the “Delhi Amendment Act
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.