RAJIV SHAKDHER
Awas 39423 Ireland Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Directorate General of Civil Aviation – Respondent
WP(C) 871/2015
WP(C) 747/2015 & CM Nos. 2894/2015 & 2895/2015
1. The captioned petitions pertain to entities, which essentially seek de-registration of aircrafts (the details qua which I shall provide hereafter), upon termination of the lease agreements with respondent no.2. The other relief sought in both petitions are consequential in nature. Respondent no.2, in both petitions, is an airline, by the name of, Spicejet Limited. For the sake of convenience hereon, respondent no.2 will be referred to as Spicejet. Furthermore, hereon I will be making a reference to aircrafts as aircraft objects.
1.1 The other respondent in the two petitions is also common, which is respondent no.1. Respondent no.1 in both petitions is the Director General of Civil Aviation. Hereafter the Director General of Civil Aviation will be referred to as DGCA.
1.2 In order to adjudicate upon the petitions before me, the following facts are required to be noticed, which I would be setting out case-wise. The discussion though, concerning both facts and the law, would be common, as arguments have been adva
Corporate Aircraft Funding Company LLC vs Union of India & Ors.
State of Bombay vs Pandurang Vinayak
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Anr. Vs. Mohd. Ismail and Ors.
Union of India and Anr. Vs. Bilash Chand Jain and Anr.
Union of India and Ors. Vs. Indo Afghan Agencies Ltd.
The CAG and Anr. Vs. K.S. Jagannathan
Sharif Ahmad & Ors. Vs Regional Transport Authority, Meerut & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.