SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 326

P.S.TEJI
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
For the Petitioner:Gaurav Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Pramod Saxena, APP.

Judgment :-

1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 06.09.2005 and order on sentence dated 08.09.2005 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and fine of Rs.500/- under Section 279 IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six days; sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and fine of Rs.500/- under Section 337 IPC, in default to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six days; sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and fine of Rs.1,000/- under Section 304-A IPC, in default to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of twelve days and upholding the same by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 20.02.2006, the present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner.

2. Factual matrix, as emerges from the record, is that on the fateful day of 23.04.1994 at about 05.00 p.m., an accident had taken place at Barafkhana Chowk. The vehicle involved in the accident was a Bus bearing registration No. DL1P 4357. In the accident, one






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top