SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 816

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondents: R1 & R2, Bharathi Raju, CGSC, R3, Manoj, Standing Counsel.

Judgment

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

1. No one was present for the petitioner on the first call. No one is present for the petitioner even on the second call although it is 2.45 P.M. I am hence proceeding to dispose of the writ petition on merits.

2. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner impugns the show cause notice dated 27.1.2015 issued by the respondent no.1. By the show cause notice, petitioner has been called upon to explain his case, as to why the petitioner’s candidature should not be cancelled and the petitioner be prevented from appearing in Staff Selection Commission’s examinations for three years on account of unfair means indulged by him in the examination conducted by the respondent no.2 on 15.4.2012. The show cause notice dated 27.1.2015 reads as under:-

“F.No.2/26/2015-ND-1/Legal

Government of India

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING

Staff Selection Commission (Northern Region)

BLOCK NO.12,CGO COMPLEX

LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110003

Dated: 27-01-2015

SHOW CAUSE NOTICE

Whereas Shri Ajay Kumar son of Shri Ravinder Singh, resident of Village-






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top