G.P.MITTAL
Industria De Diseno Textile Sa – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Cuisines Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
I.A. No. 11760/ 2013 (O. XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC)
1. By virtue of this application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the Plaintiff (Applicant) seeks ad interim injunction restraining infringement of its trademark/trade name ZARA, passing off, dilution of its trademark/trade name and delivery up against the Defendants.
2. The case set up by the Plaintiff is that the Plaintiff is an internationally reputed company engaged in the manufacture, design, sale and distribution of fashion and related lifestyle products in various classes of International Classification of Goods and Services. In India, the Plaintiff carries out commercial operations through its associate company, Inditex Trent Retail India Private Limited, a joint venture between the Plaintiff and Trent Limited of well known Tata Group Company. It is the case of the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff coined, conceived and adopted ZARA as its trademark in 1975 and opened first ZARA shop 38 years ago in A Coruna, Spain. The domain name zara.com was registered by the Plaintiff on 29th May, 1997 and the same has since been in continuous use of the Plaintiff.
3. It
Honda Motor Company Ltd. v. Kewal Bros. & Anr.
N. R. Dongre & Ors. v. Whirlpool Corp. & Anr., AIR 1995 Delhi 300
Midas Hygiene Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Sudhir Bhatia and Ors
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath (Dead) by LRs. and Ors.
Satish Khosla v. M/s. Eli Lilly Ranbaxy Ltd. & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.