SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 868

G.P.MITTAL
SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE – Appellant
Versus
AMRESH KHASSA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. K.L. Nandwani

Judgment

G.P. Mittal, J.

C.M. APPL. NO. 1110/2015 (Exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

MAC. APP. NO. 68/ 2015 AND C.M. APPL. NO. 1109/ 2015 (stay)

1. The Appellant Shriram General Insurance Company Limited impugns the judgment dated 31.10.2014 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of Rs. 26,77,320/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no. 1 and 2 for the death of Smt. Santosh, a graduate and a qualified JBT teacher.

2. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the Claims Tribunal erred in relying upon the judgment of this Court in Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited v. Master Manmeet Singh and Ors., 2012 ACJ 721: 1 (2013) ACC 360 computing the loss of gratuitous services rendered by Smt. Santosh.

3. It is urged that in the instant case, the claim petition was filed seeking compensation based upon the potential income of the deceased claiming it to be Rs. 25,000/- per month. It is contended that the Claims Tribunal erred in granting future prospects to the extent of 25% and deduction towards personal expenses was not made.

4. The learned counsel state












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top