SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 2752

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
OM PRASAD SARIN – Appellant
Versus
AJIT MEHRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.P. Sharma Advocate.
Mr. Pramod Kumar Singhal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 09.12.2011 by which the ARC has dismissed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed by the petitioners/landlords with respect to the suit/tenanted premises comprising of five rooms, one drawing room, two kitchens on the ground floor and one tin shed on the first floor of property bearing no.4538, Daiwara, Nai Sarak, Delhi-6 as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed along with the eviction petition. The eviction petition has been dismissed after evidence was led by both the parties.

2. The original eviction petition was filed by the landlady Smt.Munni Devi Sarin widow of late Sh.Amba Prasad Sarin for her own requirement as also the requirement of her two sons, one of whom was unmarried. The married son Sh.Rattan Prasad Sarin was having besides himself his wife, one daughter and two sons. When the eviction petition was filed in the year 1991, the two sons of Sh. Rattan Prasad Sarin were 10 years and 9 years of age, and therefore






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top