SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 855

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION – Appellant
Versus
FAHEEM BAIG – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For The Petitioner: Mr. A.S. Dateer, Adv.

Judgment :

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 13th August, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of CM No.13032/2012 under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) filed by the appellant in Cont. Cas.(C) No.484/2011 filed by the respondent no.3 herein i.e. Ajmera Steel Pvt. Ltd. against the officers of the appellant. This appeal is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay of 17 days in filing thereof and is listed subject to office objection as to the maintainability thereof.


2. As far as the aspect of maintainability of the appeal is concerned, the Full Bench of this Court in Weizmann Ltd. Vs. Ms. Shoes East Ltd. 200 (2013) DLT 257 has held that a decision either way on an application filed under Section 340 of the CrPC decides valuable rights of parties and therefore an appeal would lie under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, as applicable to this Court. Office objection qua maintainability of the appeal is thus overruled.

3. However being prima facie of the opinion, though for reasons other than those given by the learned Single Judge, that there is no merit in the application filed by t




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top