INDERMEET KAUR
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Mangal & Others – Respondent
1. I.A.No.16776/2009: This is an application filed by the plaintiff under order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. Vide ex parte order dated 22.12.2009 defendants had been restrained from using the trademark/trading style TOYOTA, the toyota device, INNOVA and PRIUS in respect of auto parts and accessories or any other allied goods or to do anything which may cause confusion or deception amounting to passing off defendant?s goods as that of the plaintiff.
2. I.A.No.110/2010: This is an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC filed by the defendant; he has prayed that the ex parte order dated 22.12.2009 be set aside.
3. I.A.No.1156/2010: This is an application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC filed by the plaintiff; it has been prayed that the defendant in spite of the ex parte injunction operating against him is continuing user of the trademarks of the plaintiff and is also guilty of passing off of the goods of the plaintiff as that of his own.
4. Crl.M.A.No.1032/2010: This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 340 Cr.P.C. and supplements the prayers made in the application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC. The affidavit filed by the defendant along with his application under Or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.