SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 1341

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Subash Chander – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwan Yadav – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vikas Yadav, Kuldeep Balhara

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.:-

1. This petition raises questions of general importance, arising frequently in trials. The questions can be framed thus:-

(i) What is the challenge/fate of the documents produced for the first time during the cross examination of a witness and which are denied by the witness? Whether the said documents are required to be retained/kept on the court file or merely because the witness has denied the document, the same has to be returned to the party which has produced the same?

(ii) If the said documents are to be kept on record/retained, what is the status thereof?

(iii) Whether a party producing the said document can prove the same at the stage of his own evidence or for the reason of having not produced it along with its plaint/written statement and having chosen to use it only during cross examination, is then barred from treating the document as own document and proving the same? Since I am unable to find any judgment completely considering the aspects and further since in my opinion these questions plague the courts on a daily basis, it is deemed appropriate to answer the same.

2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is preferred by th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top