S. RAVINDRA BHAT, VIPIN SANGHI
Mahabir Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Transport Corporation – Respondent
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questions an order dated 23.03.2012 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter ‘the Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 3579/2011 and the order dated 12.05.2011 of the Delhi Transport Corporation (hereafter ‘DTC’) to the extent that it denies the petitioner notional fixation of pay and increments and counts the period out of employment as not being in service, for the purposes of pension and terminal benefits. The question requiring decision is whether an employee reinstated to his position is entitled to benefits of notional pay fixation, increments etc. and also additionally, if his services are to be counted for the purpose of pension and terminal benefits for the intervening period (between the date of termination order and the date of reinstatement).
2. The facts are that the petitioner is an employee of the DTC. He was removed from service by an order dated 19.01.1995 on allegations of misconduct. Aggrieved, he raised an industrial dispute, which led to the Labour Court, by its Award dated 02.08.2010, setting aside the enquiry proceedings as well as the removal order. The DTC was directed to reins
Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya and Ors.
General Manager, Haryana Roadways v. Rudhan Singh
Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v. Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd.
J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. K.P. Agrawal and Anr.
Senior Superintendent Telegraph (Traffic) Bhopal v. Santosh Kumar
Surendra Kumar Verma v. Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.