SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 1696

HIMA KOHLI
Sugeeta Chhabra – Appellant
Versus
Harish Nayar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff :Mr, Sanjeev Sindhivani, Advocate.
For the Defendant:Mr. R.P. Sharma, Advocate.

Hima Kohli, J.;—

1. This application has been filed by the defendant under Order VI Rule 17 CPC praying inter alia for permission to amend the written statement.

2. The brief background of the present case is that the plaintiff, who is the sister of the defendant, has instituted the accompanying suit for partition, permanent injunction and rendition of accounts against her brother, the defendant herein, praying inter alia that a decree of partition be passed, declaring her to be the 50% shareholder in the property bearing No.41, Prithvi Raj Road, New Delhi and 50% shareholder in the movable properties owned by the father of the parties, i.e., late Shri R.G.Nayar. Apart from the aforesaid relief, the plaintiff has also prayed for a decree of rendition of accounts and permanent injunction against the defendant.

3. The present suit was registered on 27.05.2011 and notice was issued to the defendant returnable before the Joint Registrar on 01.09.2011. Appearance was entered on behalf of the defendant on 01.09.2011 and a written statement was filed on 18.10.2011. Replication to the written statement was filed by the plaintiff on 14.11.2011. Admission and denial of documents was concluded o




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top