1. Present letters patent appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 25th October, 2013 passed by learned Single Judge, whereby appellant’s writ petition being W.P.(C) 6718/2013 was dismissed. The relevant portion of the impugned order reads as under:-

“11. It would thus be seen that the contract between the parties specifically empowered the respondents to blacklist the petitioner firm. Therefore, when the show-cause notice received by the petitioner expressly mentioned of such action as may be deemed appropriate by the Competent Authority, the petitioner could easily visualize that the action proposed by the Competent Authority could include blacklisting of the petitioner – firm. Considering the express terms of the contract between the parties, it was not necessary for the respondent to specifically refer to the proposed blacklisting in the show-cause notice issued to the petitioner. The purpose of show-cause notice is primarily to enable the notice to meet the grounds on which an action is proposed against it and such grounds were fully detailed in the show-cause notice issued to the petitioner. In fact, even prior to issue of the show-cause no