G.P.MITTAL
Kamal Mitra Chenoy & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Dunlop India Ltd. & Anr. – Respondent
IA No. 1072/2013 (under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC)
IA No. 4904/2013 (under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC) and
IA No. 891/2014 (under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC in CS (OS) 3391/2012)
1. Plaintiff No. 1 (Dr. Kamal Mitra Chenoy) is husband and Plaintiff No. 2 (Dr. Anuradha Mitra Chenoy) is the wife. A suit for eviction/possession and permanent injunction was filed by the Plaintiffs against the Defendants with the allegations that Property No. 19, Block No. 171, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi, as described in Para 1 of the plaint was let out by Plaintiffs to Defendant No. 1 (M/s. Dunlop India Limited) through its authorised signatory Mr. R.K. Kapoor for the residence of Defendant No. 2 (Dr. A.P. Singh) and his family members vide a registered Lease Deed for a period of three years with effect from 01.08.2009. If the lessee was desirous of renewal of the lease, he was required to request the lessor in writing at least three months in advance before expiry of the term of the lease. Unless specifically agreed in writing by the lessor (Plaintiff No. 1), the lease was not to be renewed automatically on the expiry of the lease period. Similarly, by a Hire Agreement dated 01.08.2009, the fittings and fixtur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.