SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 1137

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, MUKTA GUPTA
Mukesh Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Vijay Sansawal and Mr. Amitesh Gaurav, Advocates

Judgment

Mukta Gupta, J.

CM Nos.11502/2015 (additional documents) & 11503/2015 (Directions)

1. By these applications under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC and Order XI Rule 12 and 14 read with Section 151 CPC Mukesh Kumar Gupta, the Appellant inter alia prays that he was granted No Objection Certificate for installation of separate electricity connection and despite due diligence he has now been able to find those documents and that he is also in possession of the rent receipts deposited by him to the Rent Controller, South and they be permitted to be placed on record.

2. In CM No.11503/2015 he further prays that the Respondent be directed to produce all the documents relating to the sanction plan of the suit property.

3. The fact that the electricity meter was in the name of the Appellant and that Mukesh Kumar had deposited the rent after notice was given by the Respondent have been duly noted by the learned Single Judge and thus no case is made out for leading additional evidence or directing the Respondent Surendra Kumar Gupta for discovery of the documents.

4. Applications are dismissed as such.

RFA(OS) 63/2015

1. The appeal is listed for preliminary hearing for admission. The record of the suit




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top