RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.

1. This writ petition is directed against two orders passed by respondent no. 1 and 2. Respondent no. l and 2, in effect, represent the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (hereafter referred to as IOCL). The two orders which are impugned are: order dated 30.11.2010 and 11.03.2011.

THE SCOPE OF THE IMPUGNED ORDERS & THEIR EFFECT

1.1 By virtue of order dated 30.11.2010, IOCL communicated to the petitioner, i.e., Ms Anita Devi (who I shall be referring to hereon as Anita Devi-I that she had been de-empanelled. The facts, which will be narrated hereinafter by me, would show that there is, in the record, reference to a namesake of the petitioner; which was a cause of much confusion and concern to Anita Devi-I. Therefore, for the convenience, the namesake will, accordingly, be referred to as Anita Devi-II).

1.2 Continuing with the narrative, the aforesaid impugned order was suggestive of the fact that the de-empanelment of Anita Devi-I had come about on account of a complaint received that she had violated multiple dealership norm. Besides this, the said impugned order also adverted to the fact that IOCL had received another complaint, albeit of a candidate, of having b