ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.

1. Both the petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by common order.

2. The Petitioners in Crl. M.C. No. 1758/2010 are sisters of the husband of Respondent no.2.

3. On the case lodged by Respondent no.2 against them and other accused persons including their brother and others (FIR No. 651/2001 dated 11.08.2001, PS Malviya Nagar, instituted under sections 498A/406/420/494/327/506/34 IPC), they were chargesheeted on 09.04.2004.

4. The petitioners, by order dated 02.09.2009 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, were charged under section 120B IPC.

5. The brother of the petitioners (husband of the Respondent no.2) was charged for offences under section 498A/494/120B IPC.

6. The petitioners were discharged for other offences for which they were chargesheeted. Some of the accused persons namely the parents and brother of the second wife of K.D. Kapoor (the husband of Respondent no.2) and the second wife (Smt. Poonam, petitioner in Crl. Rev. P. No. 254/2010) were discharged of all offences.

7. The Petitioners, against the aforesaid order dated 02.09.2009 passed by the Learned MM, preferred a revision petition before the Additional Sessio