BADAR DURREZ AHMED, SANJEEV SACHDEVA
BALWANT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL)
1. The counter affidavit handed over by Mr. Sidharath Panda, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent No. 4 and 5 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit as the necessary averments are contained in the writ petition.
2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the “2013 Act”) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the “1894 Act”) and in respect of which Award No. 15/1987-88 dated 05.06.1987 was made, inter alia, in respect of the petitioner’s land, comprised in Khasra Nos. 1033/1 (2-9), 1041/1/2 (1-2), 1041/2 (2-14), 1042/2 (3-11) & 1042/1 (1-5), measuring 14 bighas and 6 biswas in all in Village Chattarpur, New Delhi, shall be deemed to have lapsed.
3. The petitioner had also claimed relief in respect of Khasra No. 1034/1 but accordi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.