S.RAVINDRA BHAT, DEEPA SHARMA
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT)
1. The petitioner seeks directions for quashing of letters dated 09.08.2012 and 26.02.2013 which extended the period of his suspension – initially made by order dated 01.06.2011.
2. The brief facts are that the petitioner was serving as an Assistant Commandant and was posted on 14.03.2011 with the 76th Battalion of the Border Security Force (BSF). A First Information Report (FIR) alleging commission of offences punishable under certain provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) were lodged against the third party for selling 5000 litres of kerosene oil. A preliminary inquiry was conducted which resulted in the petitioner being charge-sheeted along with other employees. This led to a Staff Court of Enquiry on various dates in March, April and May 2011. As a consequence, the petitioner’s superior officer recommended that he ought to be placed under suspension. On 01.06.2011, the Director General placed him under suspension for 90 days with immediate effect. During that time, he was attached to the 32rd Battalion and paid Subsistence Allowance in accordance with the Rules. The suspension order did not spell-out its duration. It merely stated tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.