SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 1600

S.P.GARG
Amjad Ali – Appellant
Versus
Salma Begum – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Ankit Sharma, Advocate.
Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate.

Judgment

S.P. Garg, J.

1. The instant revision petition has been filed by the petitioner to impugn the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 21.08.2014 of learned Principal Judge, Family Courts in MT No.345/14 under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure whereby he was directed to pay Rs. 8,000/- per month as maintenance to each of the respondents. The petition is contested by the respondents.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record. In the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. the respondents claimed maintenance to the tune of Rs. 75,000/- p.m. It was alleged that the total income of the petitioner from all sources was Rs. 1,50,000/- per month. In response to that, the petitioner claimed that he was getting Rs. 19,000/- p.m. as salary due to his employment with Kalka Public School Alaknanda, New Delhi. He claimed that Respondent No.1 was earning Rs. 3,000/- per month by doing the work of embroidery or tailoring.

Relationship of husband and wife between the parties is not in dispute. Admittedly, respondent No.2 was born out of this wedlock and presently he is residing with his mother. The respondent-wife in her evidence has levelled s





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top