P.S.TEJI
Madhukar Arenja – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Bhatia – Respondent
P.S. Teji, J.
1. The present revision petition has been filed feeling aggrieved of the order dated 26.03.2007 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, whereby the criminal complaint bearing No.1270/2001 filed by the petitioner/complainant for offence under Section 405, 406, 415, 417, 418, 420, 421, 424 and 506 of IPC was dismissed.
2. Factual matrix, as emerges from the record, is that the petitioner had filed a criminal complaint against the respondent alleging therein that the petitioner was a partner of registered firm Arenja & Company. The said partnership firm was formed vide Deed of Partnership dated 13.04.1981. Apart from the complainant, his mother Smt. Promila Devi Arenja, respondent and his father Sh. Jodharam Bhatia were other partners of the said firm. The firm dealt with in Kiriana, chemicals, dry fruits, fresh fruits and other miscellaneous business. From the inception of the firm, it was decided that Sh. Jodharam Bhatia and the respondent shall be active partners of the firm and they conducted day to day business of the firm. Entire capital and other assets were contributed by the complainant and his mother, whereas the respondent and his father never mad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.