RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Trigen Electronics Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. This order is in continuation of the order dated 8th July, 2015.
2. The counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has under the cover of letter dated 8th July, 2015 to the Assistant Commissioner, (RP Cell) of the respondent No.1 South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) handed over Pay Orders of the total value of Rs.52,16,018/- being the amount for deposit for which statement was made on 27th May, 2015. A copy of the said letter along with the photocopies of the Pay Orders is handed over in the Court and taken on record. A copy of the same has also been handed over to the counsel for the respondent No.1 SDMC.
3. Though the counsel for the respondent No.1 SDMC states that it will have to be verified, whether the correct payment has indeed been made but I feel that there is no reason to doubt the statement of the counsel for the petitioner that the amount vide Pay Orders good for payment has indeed been deposited.
4. The counsels have been heard.
5. At the time of issuance of notice of this petition on 27th May, 2015, the following order was passed:
“The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a letter dated 28.03.2015,
Kulja Industries Ltd. Vs. Western Telecom Project
Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal (1975) 1 SCC 70
B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd. Vs. Nair Coal Services Ltd. (2006) 11 SCC 548
Patel Engineering Limited Vs. Union of India (2012) 11 SCC 257
Brite Aricon (Constortium) Vs. Airports Authority of India 203 (2013) DLT 408
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.